Council

Councillor

8 To Be Elected

Mark Douglas Albrecht: No response.

Kelly Allard: No response.

Laura Lee Butterfield: No response.

Stephen Campbell: No response.

Dana Eric Christensen: No response.

Ted Clugston: No response.

Bill Cocks: No response.

Gordon Edward Cowan: 11 years as a business owner , 24 combined years of experience on municipal, Provincial and national boards.

Robert Dumanowski: I bring a strong combination of professional and community experience to this role. As a school principal with over 30 years in education, I’ve developed leadership, decision-making, and problem-solving skills while working closely with diverse groups of people. In addition, I have had the privilege of serving on City Council for 24 years, during which time I have chaired or vice-chaired every Standing Committee. This experience has given me a deep understanding of how our city operates, how to manage complex issues, and how to bring people together to find practical solutions. I believe both my professional and council experience transfer directly to this role. I’m used to navigating budgets, listening carefully to different perspectives, and ensuring decisions are made with the community’s best interests in mind. Most importantly, these roles have taught me the value of collaboration, accountability, and clear communication—qualities I will continue to bring to the work of Council.

Christien (C.K.) Ellis: No response.

Jodi Faith: No response.

Don Fedoruk: No response.

Ron Fode: I have owned and managed many businesses in the city. I have been on boards in different capacity’s and understand board governance. I know how to work on a team and respect all points of view.

Brock Hale: No response.

Chris Hellman: No response.

Jay Hitchen: No response.

Donald Brent Knudsen: No response.

Adam Daniel Koch: No response.

Pamela Kunz: No response.

Yusuf Ibrahim Mohammed: Over the last 20 years in Medicine Hat, I’ve worked in leadership, consulting, community building, and intercultural inclusion. My academic background includes a Master’s in Management and a Bachelor’s in Communications, training that strengthened my ability to connect people, ideas, and systems across sectors and cultures. Some highlights: - Consulting with businesses, nonprofits, and government bodies — I’ve helped organizations scale effectively, streamline operations, strengthen governance, and align their mission with measurable results. - The Connection — I founded and ran a community organization that trained youth and nonprofits in leadership, cultural intelligence, and sustainable management. - Advisory roles — Over the years, I’ve served on the Medicine Hat College Board of Governors, supporting local post-secondary growth and skills training. I also contributed to the Provincial Advisory Councils and chaired Medicine Hat’s Social Development Committee, helping shape local strategies for building community capacity. - Cross-sector engagement — My work spans educational institutions, local businesses, civic organizations, and immigrant and cultural groups, building bridges that support shared learning and collaboration. Because of this experience and education, I bring: Systems thinking — understanding how city elements like utilities, infrastructure, economic development, and human capital connect and influence one another. Capacity-building mindset — helping people and teams grow from within, fostering sustainable progress rather than quick fixes. Bridging skills — applying cultural intelligence, active listening, and the ability to translate complex or technical policy language into clear, accessible communication. Accountability orientation — designing measurable goals and feedback loops so that actions consistently match the city’s commitments. These skills matter for a councillor. It’s not enough to set direction. You must ensure that plans are not only visionary but also actionable, sustainable, and responsive to the real needs of the people you serve.

Kevin Monson: No response.

Immanuel Moritz: I have a construction business owner background which requires financial proficiency, strategic planning, budget control, and collaboration. Serving two terms on the Medicine Hat Catholic Board of Education and ten years on the Municipal Planning Commission has given me insight into how government works. Taken together, I have the skills to be on council.

Randall Noble: I bring 17 years of combined experience in leadership, hospitality management, marketing, office administration, hiring, employee relations, communication, and health & safety. My background has equipped me with strong people management skills, strategic problem-solving abilities, and a proven track record of driving organizational growth and operational efficiency.

Kaleb Orge: No response.

Cheryl Phaff: No response.

Steven Pudwell: Having been born and raised in Medicine Hat, I bring a deep-rooted understanding of our community and the people who call it home. Over the past 30 years, I’ve built a career in business that spans sales, marketing, project management, partnership in business ownership and leadership—skills that translate directly into results-driven service on City Council. I’ve served as a director with the Medicine Hat Construction Association, three terms as a director with the Chamber of Commerce, and held executive positions as well as President. I also chaired multiple committees and participated in many business advocacy projects. These roles have given me firsthand insight into the needs of local businesses and the importance of collaboration between the private sector and municipal government. As a proud member of the Kinsmen Club since 1998, I’ve chaired numerous fundraising and service projects, i have served in executive roles, including President. This volunteer work has strengthened my commitment to community service and taught me how to rally support, manage resources, and deliver results. I’m ready to roll up my sleeves and get to work. My experience has taught me how to listen, lead, and take action—and I’m eager to apply those skills to help shape a more resilient Medicine Hat.

Michael Reid: No response.

Dan Reynish: No response.

Brian Edward Robinson: No response.

Kirby Schafer: No response.

Shila Sharps: No response.

Kirsten Spek: No response.

Micheal Starner: No response.

Clayton Stevens: No response.

Dave Toth: No response.

Alison Van Dyke: No response.

Brian Varga: No response.

Troy Wason: No response.

Stuart Young: No response.

Councillor

8 To Be Elected

Mark Douglas Albrecht: No response.

Kelly Allard: No response.

Laura Lee Butterfield: No response.

Stephen Campbell: No response.

Dana Eric Christensen: No response.

Ted Clugston: No response.

Bill Cocks: No response.

Gordon Edward Cowan: Affordability our tax and utility increases are just not sustainable.

Robert Dumanowski: I believe Medicine Hat has many strengths, but like any community, we also face important challenges. Some of the biggest issues include managing the rising costs of living, ensuring our utilities and infrastructure remain publicly owned, reliable and sustainable, and supporting continued economic growth so that businesses and families can thrive here. Housing affordability and keeping our community attractive for both new residents and investment are also key considerations. My approach to these issues is to listen carefully, work collaboratively, and focus on practical solutions that balance short-term needs with long-term sustainability. That means protecting the services and amenities people value, while also being mindful of costs to taxpayers. It also means fostering partnerships—with local organizations, regional partners, and other levels of government—so that we can maximize opportunities and share solutions. I believe with thoughtful planning, open communication, and a willingness to work together, Medicine Hat will continue to grow as a vibrant, affordable, and welcoming community.

Christien (C.K.) Ellis: No response.

Jodi Faith: No response.

Don Fedoruk: No response.

Ron Fode: We need ti get the budget under control and stop needless spending. We need to create economic growth opportunities. We need to have a cohesive council that has the interests of its citizens at heart.

Brock Hale: No response.

Chris Hellman: No response.

Jay Hitchen: No response.

Donald Brent Knudsen: No response.

Adam Daniel Koch: No response.

Pamela Kunz: No response.

Yusuf Ibrahim Mohammed: Some of the major challenges I see: - Economic resilience & diversification — with global shifts in industry, energy, and demographics, we can’t rely on a single economic driver. - Labour force gaps & youth retention — due to retirement, we must equip, attract, and retain skilled workers. - Housing affordability & inclusive growth — ensuring all residents can find homes, and that growth doesn’t price out long-term community members. - Trust in City Hall & governance culture — tensions between council and administration have eroded confidence; we need more transparency, accountability, and collaborative culture. - Infrastructure & capital renewal — maintaining aging roads, utilities, and facilities while investing in future-ready assets. My approach: - Use data-first diagnostics (benchmarking, gap analysis) before committing to big projects. - Prioritize shared planning tables — business, education, nonprofits, and residents co‑designing solutions (e.g., training pipelines, incubator hubs). - Focus on strategic, phased investment—start where the ROI is strongest and scale smartly. - Embed evaluation and feedback loops so we can adjust the course if things aren’t working. - Rebuild trust by open governance practices, reporting, and resident co-design in decisions.

Kevin Monson: No response.

Immanuel Moritz: The number one issue is economic development and population growth. . Our net population growth over the past decade has been 11, not 1100, not 11,000 ( according to 2024 CMH financial report). We have many positives – electricity, water, sunshine, Highways 1, 3, 41; CPR mainline, recreation and cultural opportunities, and, of course, its people. Face to face works, whether at business conferences, economic development forums, or with friends and family (who are the core of ambassadorship). Invite newcomers - ask “how can we help?” Use effective policy to eliminate red tape, reduce costs and time for permits, and discontinue offsite levies. Use all the resources we have – taxation, land, and utilities to attract new business.

Randall Noble: Affordability- a temporary tax freeze until we can come up with a fair and gradual plan that benefits, the citizen, businesses, the city. Well, also showing that we are using the tax dollars effectively to move Medicine Hat forward. Safety and support- work with local nonprofits to see what is needed to deal with these issues of homelessness, and crime. Work with provincial and federal governments as well to provide support for these issues. Business growth, and support- we need to cut the red tape, and support any new business that is wanting to come to Medicine Hat, and make it easier for them to be able to open. We also have to support our local businesses, as they are the backbone to any community.

Kaleb Orge: No response.

Cheryl Phaff: No response.

Steven Pudwell: Medicine Hat can longer stall progress. We need to strengthen our business economy, address affordability, build a safer and more connected community.

Michael Reid: No response.

Dan Reynish: No response.

Brian Edward Robinson: No response.

Kirby Schafer: No response.

Shila Sharps: No response.

Kirsten Spek: No response.

Micheal Starner: No response.

Clayton Stevens: No response.

Dave Toth: No response.

Alison Van Dyke: No response.

Brian Varga: No response.

Troy Wason: No response.

Stuart Young: No response.

Councillor

8 To Be Elected

Mark Douglas Albrecht: No response.

Kelly Allard: No response.

Laura Lee Butterfield: No response.

Stephen Campbell: No response.

Dana Eric Christensen: No response.

Ted Clugston: No response.

Bill Cocks: No response.

Gordon Edward Cowan: The role is to provide a safe affordable community. Attract industry and jobs to the community.

Robert Dumanowski: The role of municipal government is to provide the essential services and infrastructure that support daily life in our community—things like roads, water, utilities, recreation facilities, and public safety. It also plays an important role in planning for the future, fostering economic development, and creating an environment where residents and businesses can succeed. Having served on Council for 24 years, and chaired or vice-chaired every Standing Committee, I’ve seen firsthand how complex that balance can be. I don’t believe it’s as simple as saying the City does too much or too little—it’s about continually adjusting to meet community needs. Some areas may require more attention as the city grows, while others can be streamlined. The key is thoughtful, responsible decision-making that reflects community priorities, provides value for taxpayers, and ensures long-term sustainability. I see the City’s role as being a strong steward of resources, a partner with residents and organizations, and a leader in shaping a community where people are proud to live and work.

Christien (C.K.) Ellis: No response.

Jodi Faith: No response.

Don Fedoruk: No response.

Ron Fode: The role of a municipal government is to responsibly manage budgets, create policies and bylaws for change, promote Medicine Hat and advocate to all other levels of government to ensure our needs are being met.

Brock Hale: No response.

Chris Hellman: No response.

Jay Hitchen: No response.

Donald Brent Knudsen: No response.

Adam Daniel Koch: No response.

Pamela Kunz: No response.

Yusuf Ibrahim Mohammed: Municipal governments exist to deliver core services closest to people: infrastructure, public utilities, land-use planning, parks, local safety, and community amenities. I don’t think the City intended to do too much in principle, but there are times when capacity or mandate stretches too thin. Sometimes we overcommit without embedding the resources, oversight, or clarity to sustain. So the better question is: Are we doing the right things well? My aim is: fewer half-measures, more well-executed core services, and strategic new initiatives when the city is ready and able.

Kevin Monson: No response.

Immanuel Moritz: First and foremost, is to work for the citizens of the Hat, to provide good governance and outcomes. The cornerstones are taxation, utilities, land use, protective services, wellness and recreation. All governments do too many things, often at cross purposes. The city should stay in its lane, not allow higher governments to download programs, and focus on the needs of its citizens.

Randall Noble: The role of the municipal government, is to support your citizens, and grow your city. Well, managing it in a effective and responsible manner. I believe the city could do more in promoting our wonderful city, to have population or business growth.

Kaleb Orge: No response.

Cheryl Phaff: No response.

Steven Pudwell: The role of a municipal government is to support economic development, manage finances responsibly (through proper budgeting, fair taxation, and infrastructure investment), and ensure that citizens are heard and represented. I believe the City of Medicine Hat needs to take a closer look at what initiatives it’s involved in and how so we can focus on what truly benefits our community and delivers value to resident

Michael Reid: No response.

Dan Reynish: No response.

Brian Edward Robinson: No response.

Kirby Schafer: No response.

Shila Sharps: No response.

Kirsten Spek: No response.

Micheal Starner: No response.

Clayton Stevens: No response.

Dave Toth: No response.

Alison Van Dyke: No response.

Brian Varga: No response.

Troy Wason: No response.

Stuart Young: No response.

Councillor

8 To Be Elected

Mark Douglas Albrecht: No response.

Kelly Allard: No response.

Laura Lee Butterfield: No response.

Stephen Campbell: No response.

Dana Eric Christensen: No response.

Ted Clugston: No response.

Bill Cocks: No response.

Gordon Edward Cowan: Most definitely to high.

Robert Dumanowski: Property taxes are an important tool for funding the services and infrastructure that make our community work—things like roads, utilities, recreation facilities, and public safety. I believe the focus should always be on ensuring residents get good value for their taxes, while striving to keep them as low as possible, especially in these lean times. With my extensive experience on Council, I have seen how important it is to balance community needs with taxpayers’ ability to pay. That means carefully reviewing budgets, prioritizing essential services, and looking for efficiencies wherever possible, while still investing in the long-term health and growth of our city. Ultimately, property taxes should fairly support a strong, safe, and sustainable community, while minimizing the burden on residents. The goal is to maintain the services and opportunities that make Medicine Hat a great place to live, work, and raise a family, without overburdening taxpayers.

Christien (C.K.) Ellis: No response.

Jodi Faith: No response.

Don Fedoruk: No response.

Ron Fode: I would like to see no tax increases for the next two years by curbing needless spending.

Brock Hale: No response.

Chris Hellman: No response.

Jay Hitchen: No response.

Donald Brent Knudsen: No response.

Adam Daniel Koch: No response.

Pamela Kunz: No response.

Yusuf Ibrahim Mohammed: Many residents feel the burden is heavy—and I hear that at every door. I don’t think taxes are unreasonably low given what the city must do, but I do believe some increases have outpaced inflation or income growth. Our goal should be fairness and efficiency: - Avoid large surprise tax jumps. - Make sure new growth pays its share. - Use utility and reserve revenues wisely. - Tie tax decisions to clear service improvements. So: taxes should rise in a measured, transparent way, aligned with growth, infrastructure needs, and service levels.

Kevin Monson: No response.

Immanuel Moritz: Property taxes are only about 20% of expenditures. In a time of inflation, living cost increases, and a general economic slowdown, taxes should be frozen for the next three years. Life is tough, the city doesn’t have to make it worse.

Randall Noble: I believe taxes are getting too high, and as I have stated, we need to put in a temporary tax freeze. Until we can come up with a gradual plan that is fair to the citizens, businesses, the city. Well, also showing we are using the tax dollars effectively to move Medicine Hat forward.

Kaleb Orge: No response.

Cheryl Phaff: No response.

Steven Pudwell: I believe the City of Medicine Hat needs a clearer vision and defined goals to stimulate economic growth; because when the economy is strong, taxes can remain sustainable and the value of every tax dollar is maximized. Rather than debating whether property taxes are too high or too low, we should focus on ensuring that spending is strategic, efficient, and aligned with what residents truly need

Michael Reid: No response.

Dan Reynish: No response.

Brian Edward Robinson: No response.

Kirby Schafer: No response.

Shila Sharps: No response.

Kirsten Spek: No response.

Micheal Starner: No response.

Clayton Stevens: No response.

Dave Toth: No response.

Alison Van Dyke: No response.

Brian Varga: No response.

Troy Wason: No response.

Stuart Young: No response.

Councillor

8 To Be Elected

Mark Douglas Albrecht: No response.

Kelly Allard: No response.

Laura Lee Butterfield: No response.

Stephen Campbell: No response.

Dana Eric Christensen: No response.

Ted Clugston: No response.

Bill Cocks: No response.

Gordon Edward Cowan: The city has to spend less, develop a system of priority spending current spending levels are not sustainable.

Robert Dumanowski: I believe the City should focus on responsible, sustainable spending that balances the needs of the community with taxpayers’ ability to pay. Ideally, spending should increase in line with inflation and population growth, ensuring that essential services, infrastructure, and programs keep pace with demand without placing an undue burden on residents. At the same time, it’s important to continually look for efficiencies and innovative approaches to deliver services more effectively. In some cases, targeted investments above inflation may be necessary for critical projects or long-term initiatives that benefit the community as a whole. Including public feedback on these larger or new spending initiatives is critical to ensure decisions reflect the community’s priorities and have broad support. The key is careful planning, transparency, and prioritization to ensure that every dollar spent provides real value and supports the long-term health and vibrancy of Medicine Hat.

Christien (C.K.) Ellis: No response.

Jodi Faith: No response.

Don Fedoruk: No response.

Ron Fode: Spend less!

Brock Hale: No response.

Chris Hellman: No response.

Jay Hitchen: No response.

Donald Brent Knudsen: No response.

Adam Daniel Koch: No response.

Pamela Kunz: No response.

Yusuf Ibrahim Mohammed: I tend to lean cautiously toward increasing spending by approximately the combined rate of inflation and population growth, rather than making drastic cuts or pursuing overly aggressive expansion. Why? Because: - We have deferred maintenance and infrastructure backlogs. - We need to invest in future assets (e.g., recreation, renewable, connectivity) - But we must temper ambition with restraint—no unchecked growth without accountability.

Kevin Monson: No response.

Immanuel Moritz: Ideally the city should limit increasing expenditures. Look for savings, not spend money needlessly, and clearly define what the people need. Every organization whether you areApple or the CMH, there are opportunities for cost control.

Randall Noble: This is a difficult question without seeing what they are planning to do currently. As in any business, you need to spend money to make money. So I believe Medicine Hat does need to spend money to promote and grow Medicine Hat. But we need to do it in a responsible manner, to not increase any burden on the citizens.

Kaleb Orge: No response.

Cheryl Phaff: No response.

Steven Pudwell: No response.

Michael Reid: No response.

Dan Reynish: No response.

Brian Edward Robinson: No response.

Kirby Schafer: No response.

Shila Sharps: No response.

Kirsten Spek: No response.

Micheal Starner: No response.

Clayton Stevens: No response.

Dave Toth: No response.

Alison Van Dyke: No response.

Brian Varga: No response.

Troy Wason: No response.

Stuart Young: No response.

Councillor

8 To Be Elected

Mark Douglas Albrecht: No response.

Kelly Allard: No response.

Laura Lee Butterfield: No response.

Stephen Campbell: No response.

Dana Eric Christensen: No response.

Ted Clugston: No response.

Bill Cocks: No response.

Gordon Edward Cowan: Returned to the tax payer

Robert Dumanowski: I believe there is value in both approaches, and the key is finding a balance that benefits the community responsibly. Setting aside money in reserves allows the City to plan for future priorities, unexpected challenges (like the rebate that council gave during the province-wide utility spike), or major projects without creating sudden tax increases. It provides financial stability and ensures that important infrastructure and services can be maintained over the long term. At the same time, it’s important that taxpayers see the value of their contributions. Any surplus should be carefully reviewed, with consideration for returning funds to residents if reserves are already sufficient or if there are no immediate priorities. Ultimately, the goal should be transparency and accountability—making sure decisions about surplus funds reflect community needs, provide long-term stability, and demonstrate that the City is managing resources prudently while keeping residents’ interests in mind.

Christien (C.K.) Ellis: No response.

Jodi Faith: No response.

Don Fedoruk: No response.

Ron Fode: I would like to see this money back in the pockets of citizens at least for the next two years. Our reserves are currently healthy but citizens are struggling to make ends meet.

Brock Hale: No response.

Chris Hellman: No response.

Jay Hitchen: No response.

Donald Brent Knudsen: No response.

Adam Daniel Koch: No response.

Pamela Kunz: No response.

Yusuf Ibrahim Mohammed: I believe surpluses should primarily be retained—appropriately reserved for capital needs, infrastructure renewal, or unexpected downturns. But I also believe in transparency and resident benefit. If surplus funds exceed prudent levels, we should consider rebates, tax offsets, or one-time community investments. The mechanism and magnitude should be defined in policy, not ad hoc.

Kevin Monson: No response.

Immanuel Moritz: The city and Council should expend resources for current taxpayers not only future ones. CMH has healthy reserves, nearly $700 million dollars, some restricted, some not. In difficult economic times using some of these resources is prudent. Rebates would be a nightmare, its simpler to control taxation and utility costs.

Randall Noble: I believe if we do have leftover money, it is beneficial to keep so that we can use to future projects to benefit Medicine Hat. There is other ways the city can support our citizens, and I think we need to look at those.

Kaleb Orge: No response.

Cheryl Phaff: No response.

Steven Pudwell: I believe the City should always be working to find efficiencies and savings across all departments because when we manage resources wisely, the benefits extend to all citizens of Medicine Hat. If there’s money left over at the end of the year, it shouldn’t automatically be spent or rebated. Instead, we need a process that evaluates how those funds can best serve the community whether that’s through strategic reinvestment, reducing future tax pressure, or improving essential services. The goal should always be long-term value.

Michael Reid: No response.

Dan Reynish: No response.

Brian Edward Robinson: No response.

Kirby Schafer: No response.

Shila Sharps: No response.

Kirsten Spek: No response.

Micheal Starner: No response.

Clayton Stevens: No response.

Dave Toth: No response.

Alison Van Dyke: No response.

Brian Varga: No response.

Troy Wason: No response.

Stuart Young: No response.

Councillor

8 To Be Elected

Mark Douglas Albrecht: No response.

Kelly Allard: No response.

Laura Lee Butterfield: No response.

Stephen Campbell: No response.

Dana Eric Christensen: No response.

Ted Clugston: No response.

Bill Cocks: No response.

Gordon Edward Cowan: Affordable housing is not a city issue. The city can make land available at no cost, provide reasonable utility rates and low property taxes.

Robert Dumanowski: To me, affordable housing means ensuring that all residents have access to safe, stable, and reasonably priced housing that meets their needs. It’s about creating a balanced housing market where families, seniors, and individuals at different income levels can find suitable homes without undue financial stress. I believe the City should take a balanced approach. This includes supporting programs that assist lower-income residents when necessary, while also implementing policies and planning strategies that help prevent the overall cost of housing from rising out of control. Tools like zoning flexibility, partnerships with developers, and targeted incentives (i.e. tax/brownfield development incentives) can encourage a range of housing options, including rental and ownership, that meet community needs. Ultimately, the goal is to ensure Medicine Hat remains an affordable, inclusive, and vibrant community, where residents at all stages of life can find housing that allows them to thrive.

Christien (C.K.) Ellis: No response.

Jodi Faith: No response.

Don Fedoruk: No response.

Ron Fode: I think a combination would work. We need to look after those who require affordable housing.

Brock Hale: No response.

Chris Hellman: No response.

Jay Hitchen: No response.

Donald Brent Knudsen: No response.

Adam Daniel Koch: No response.

Pamela Kunz: No response.

Yusuf Ibrahim Mohammed: To me, affordable housing has two dimensions: 1. Cost containment across the market — policies to prevent runaway costs (zoning flexibility, incentives, efficient approvals). 2. Targeted support for lower-income residents — subsidized or mixed-income options for those who truly can’t afford standard housing. I support a hybrid approach: - Incentivize developers to include affordable units in new builds. - Use municipal land or partnerships for non-profit housing. - Facilitate housing co-ops or land trust models. - Leverage provincial and federal support to amplify local affordability projects.

Kevin Monson: No response.

Immanuel Moritz: The traditional definition of affordable housing is spending no more than 30% of your income. With ever increasing taxes at all levels, inflation, and high construction costs is the inevitable outcome. Other levels of government fund groups like the Medicine Hat Community Housing Society which makes a small dent in the need, but the city is not in a position to fund all needs. As a counterpoint, the City can thru the Land Use Bylaw, allow private developers to develop with communities with smaller houses, higher density, and greater affordability.

Randall Noble: Affordable housing is a tricky subject because everyone’s going to have a different opinion. However, we need to support programs that help people with housing, and going through hard times. We need do need to make sure it is being used effectively though if we are providing support. So it is looking at a combination of the two. This is something as a council we would need to look at, and find if it is possible.

Kaleb Orge: No response.

Cheryl Phaff: No response.

Steven Pudwell: I believe the City of Medicine Hat should focus on keeping the overall cost of housing from getting out of control by using fair and smart incentives—like encouraging diverse housing developments, streamlining approvals, and working with builders to reduce barriers. That way, we support affordability across the board, not just through subsidies.

Michael Reid: No response.

Dan Reynish: No response.

Brian Edward Robinson: No response.

Kirby Schafer: No response.

Shila Sharps: No response.

Kirsten Spek: No response.

Micheal Starner: No response.

Clayton Stevens: No response.

Dave Toth: No response.

Alison Van Dyke: No response.

Brian Varga: No response.

Troy Wason: No response.

Stuart Young: No response.

Councillor

8 To Be Elected

Mark Douglas Albrecht: No response.

Kelly Allard: No response.

Laura Lee Butterfield: No response.

Stephen Campbell: No response.

Dana Eric Christensen: No response.

Ted Clugston: No response.

Bill Cocks: No response.

Gordon Edward Cowan: Unions are unavoidable. The city must work for the residents of the city to ensure affordability.

Robert Dumanowski: I see public sector unions as an important part of City operations. They represent a large group of civil servant/employees, ensure fair working conditions, and help maintain a motivated and effective workforce, which ultimately benefits the entire community. Healthy relationships with unions are essential for smooth operations and positive morale. At the same time, it’s important to always balance fair employee compensation with fiscal responsibility. My approach would be to engage in open, respectful dialogue during negotiations, ensuring transparency and careful consideration of budgets. The goal is to find agreements that are fair to employees while protecting taxpayers and maintaining the long-term sustainability of City services. Ultimately, strong collaboration, clear communication, and thoughtful planning are key to achieving outcomes that benefit both employees and the broader community.

Christien (C.K.) Ellis: No response.

Jodi Faith: No response.

Don Fedoruk: No response.

Ron Fode: No response.

Brock Hale: No response.

Chris Hellman: No response.

Jay Hitchen: No response.

Donald Brent Knudsen: No response.

Adam Daniel Koch: No response.

Pamela Kunz: No response.

Yusuf Ibrahim Mohammed: Unions play a vital role in protecting worker rights, ensuring fair working conditions, and maintaining professionalism. I believe in respectful collective bargaining. At the same time, I will: - Insist on balance and transparency in negotiations. - Push for performance metrics tied to service outcomes. - Advocate that union contracts should allow flexibility for efficiency improvements. - Engage union leadership early so fiscal responsibility is shared rather than seen as adversarial.

Kevin Monson: No response.

Immanuel Moritz: Unions are part of the landscape. Negotiations must be open and honest serving both the interests of the citizens and the members. Any budget impacts will be felt by the membership as well. A reminder that during a difficult budget crisis in 2020 the city and the union agreed to an essential freeze in salary – a win win for all of us.

Randall Noble: Unions are there to protect the worker, but also understand that the employer has rights as well. The steps I would take is to make sure both sides are being fair, understanding, and willing to negotiate. Well, understanding that these employees are citizens as well, and paying taxes just like every other citizen. Need to understand our viewpoint of trying to maintain costs for everyone.

Kaleb Orge: No response.

Cheryl Phaff: No response.

Steven Pudwell: I respect public sector unions important role in City of Medicine Hat operations. At the same time, it’s important that negotiations are balanced with fiscal responsibility. I believe the City must approach union discussions with transparency, clear goals, and a commitment to long-term sustainability so we can support our workforce while protecting taxpayers and essential services.

Michael Reid: No response.

Dan Reynish: No response.

Brian Edward Robinson: No response.

Kirby Schafer: No response.

Shila Sharps: No response.

Kirsten Spek: No response.

Micheal Starner: No response.

Clayton Stevens: No response.

Dave Toth: No response.

Alison Van Dyke: No response.

Brian Varga: No response.

Troy Wason: No response.

Stuart Young: No response.

Councillor

8 To Be Elected

Mark Douglas Albrecht: No response.

Kelly Allard: No response.

Laura Lee Butterfield: No response.

Stephen Campbell: No response.

Dana Eric Christensen: No response.

Ted Clugston: No response.

Bill Cocks: No response.

Gordon Edward Cowan: Not in favour, but would consider a system where the city works with experts that may have a better understanding of the business and can suggest a course of action.

Robert Dumanowski: I believe the most important consideration in any decision about the City’s power utility is what will best serve residents, both now and in the long term. A Municipal Controlled Corporation (MCC) could offer opportunities for more flexible management and potential financial benefits, but it also represents a significant change in governance and oversight. Either way, the utilities must remain publicly owned - period. My approach would be to carefully review the facts, consult with experts, and consider the potential risks and benefits to the community. I believe that for a major decision like this, transparency and public input are essential. If there is significant community interest, I would support holding a referendum to ensure residents have a clear voice in the direction we take. Ultimately, my focus would be on making sure any decision prioritizes reliability, affordability, and long-term sustainability, while ensuring residents are informed and engaged in the process.

Christien (C.K.) Ellis: No response.

Jodi Faith: No response.

Don Fedoruk: No response.

Ron Fode: We need to run our utilities ourselves. If the MCC commits to making a profit why can’t we? I would support a referendum..

Brock Hale: No response.

Chris Hellman: No response.

Jay Hitchen: No response.

Donald Brent Knudsen: No response.

Adam Daniel Koch: No response.

Pamela Kunz: No response.

Yusuf Ibrahim Mohammed: I believe we should review this with great caution. Medicine Hat’s utility is a core community asset. Before converting to an MCC, we need: - A robust cost-benefit analysis - Strong community safeguards - Guarantees that it remains locally accountable - Ideally, a referendum or public vote before a major structural change Right now, I lean toward retaining direct municipal control, unless the alternative clearly gives superior transparency, performance, and community benefit.

Kevin Monson: No response.

Immanuel Moritz: The MCC would be a city owned utility, much like the separate company (Allied Oil) that ran the Manyberries oil fields. Council needs assistance in its role as decision maker, otherwise they would not have allowed the electrical pricing to ratepayers to spiral out of control two years ago. Selling to the grid for profit is great but they didn’t need to overcharge local residents. The Rate Review Committee is a start but making a decision on an MCC requires more than an executive summary. Detailed costing and an honest discussion with citizens are a must.

Randall Noble: I do not support the MCC at this time, I believe Medicine Hat needs to keep control of it. We can rely on experts to let us know if we are on the right path or need to change. I do believe we need to look at other forms of energy as well though, as long as it’s going to support Medicine Hat and move it forward. However, we do need to make sure that there is grants or funding for these projects, or investors. To not put the whole burden onto the citizens. Yes, I would support holding a referendum, to see what the citizens want before making such a major governance change.

Kaleb Orge: No response.

Cheryl Phaff: No response.

Steven Pudwell: I believe we need to explore a revised version of the MCC—one that brings together experts in the field, city employees, engaged local business leaders, and council member. Before making any major change, the City must get its house in order, assess our current assets, and develop a clear plan for future infrastructure and economic diversification. We need a long-term solution that monitors shifts in the electrical generation market and prepares us for what’s ahead. Ultimately, council will vote on the task force’s recommendations grounded in transparency and informed input.

Michael Reid: No response.

Dan Reynish: No response.

Brian Edward Robinson: No response.

Kirby Schafer: No response.

Shila Sharps: No response.

Kirsten Spek: No response.

Micheal Starner: No response.

Clayton Stevens: No response.

Dave Toth: No response.

Alison Van Dyke: No response.

Brian Varga: No response.

Troy Wason: No response.

Stuart Young: No response.

Councillor

8 To Be Elected

Mark Douglas Albrecht: No response.

Kelly Allard: No response.

Laura Lee Butterfield: No response.

Stephen Campbell: No response.

Dana Eric Christensen: No response.

Ted Clugston: No response.

Bill Cocks: No response.

Gordon Edward Cowan: Public trust in city hall was eroded by extremely poor leadership , extremely poor communication and lack.of common sense. Respectfully none of the current council has earned re election.

Robert Dumanowski: I think it’s fair to say that prolonged conflicts can create concerns among residents, and maintaining public trust is always a top priority for Council. The good news is that our City has established processes and oversight mechanisms designed to promote accountability, transparency, and collaboration. In terms of improvements, it’s important to look at a range of measures—legal, procedural, and cultural—that encourage clear communication, respectful debate, and shared understanding between Council and administration. Open dialogue, strong policies, and a culture of professionalism are key to preventing future breakdowns. I would strongly encourage residents to read (at least) the first half of the most recent Municipal Inspection Report that council asked the province to complete, which provides a thorough overview of the issues, the steps already taken, and the context behind recent events. Having that information helps the public understand the situation fully and supports informed discussions about how we can continue to strengthen trust in local government.

Christien (C.K.) Ellis: No response.

Jodi Faith: No response.

Don Fedoruk: No response.

Ron Fode: Everyone needs to know their role, stay in their lane and follow protocol. There needs to be respect among all council members.

Brock Hale: No response.

Chris Hellman: No response.

Jay Hitchen: No response.

Donald Brent Knudsen: No response.

Adam Daniel Koch: No response.

Pamela Kunz: No response.

Yusuf Ibrahim Mohammed: Yes. The conflicts between the council and administration have strained trust. To rebuild it: - Strengthen governance protocols (clear roles, dispute resolution) - Mandate public reporting dashboards and performance metrics. - Cultivate a culture of humility, accountability, and listening. - Insist on community co-design early in decisions, not after These changes should be structural, not just rhetorical.

Kevin Monson: No response.

Immanuel Moritz: Of course the infighting led to an erosion of trust. Council’s first role is to work for the benefit of citizens, and they failed. Trust will need to be earned by the new council, by being open, honest and effective. Everyone must know their role Mayor, Council and CAO and each need to stay in their lane. Council is strategic planning, policy and budget control. The CAO is council’s only employee whose role it is to operate the day to day work at the city. Collaboration is key.

Randall Noble: Yes, I do believe it has been damaged. We as the next council going in, need to work with administration to come up with a plan for fair and respectful communication and collaboration. We need to make sure any bylaws, an employment rules are being followed.

Kaleb Orge: No response.

Cheryl Phaff: No response.

Steven Pudwell: We need to encourage teamwork from top to bottom and bottom to top in city hall. This can be done by setting clear policy, easy methods to follow and succeed.

Michael Reid: No response.

Dan Reynish: No response.

Brian Edward Robinson: No response.

Kirby Schafer: No response.

Shila Sharps: No response.

Kirsten Spek: No response.

Micheal Starner: No response.

Clayton Stevens: No response.

Dave Toth: No response.

Alison Van Dyke: No response.

Brian Varga: No response.

Troy Wason: No response.

Stuart Young: No response.

Councillor

8 To Be Elected

Mark Douglas Albrecht: No response.

Kelly Allard: No response.

Laura Lee Butterfield: No response.

Stephen Campbell: No response.

Dana Eric Christensen: No response.

Ted Clugston: No response.

Bill Cocks: No response.

Gordon Edward Cowan: Decision making is the role of the elected officials. There should not be disputes common sense a meaningfull communication should create a good working relationship.

Robert Dumanowski: I believe the current system works well when there is clear communication, mutual respect, and a shared understanding of roles. City Administration plays an important role by providing expertise, advice, and recommendations, while elected councillors are accountable to residents and make the final decisions. Both roles are essential, and balance is achieved when everyone respects their responsibilities. When disputes arise between the mayor, council, and city manager, they should be resolved through open dialogue guided by established policies and procedures. Mediation or facilitation can also be helpful in ensuring disagreements are addressed constructively and collaboratively, before escalating to legal processes. These processes are guided by the Municipal Government Act (MGA), and provide the framework for accountability and decision-making at the municipal level. Unless the MGA is amended, we all must work within the current system/framework for decision-making.. The goal should always be to find practical solutions that prioritize the community’s best interests, maintain trust, and ensure the smooth functioning of City operations.

Christien (C.K.) Ellis: No response.

Jodi Faith: No response.

Don Fedoruk: No response.

Ron Fode: City administrators have a line job and that’s to present the facts to council with recommendations. They need to follow protocol when implementing changes. Disputes need to be handled through policy whenever possible to ensure are not wasting tax payers money.

Brock Hale: No response.

Chris Hellman: No response.

Jay Hitchen: No response.

Donald Brent Knudsen: No response.

Adam Daniel Koch: No response.

Pamela Kunz: No response.

Yusuf Ibrahim Mohammed: I believe the balance should carefully respect the democratic mandate of elected officials, while leveraging the professional expertise of administration. Disputes should ideally be resolved through clear policy direction first, then through mediation or oversight committees, and escalated to legal processes only when absolutely necessary.

Kevin Monson: No response.

Immanuel Moritz: The city operational information comes through the CAO, it should not be the only source. The Premier has given a new policy mandate to Municpal Affairs to create a Universal Code of Conduct that will, hopefully, lead to better conflict resolution.

Randall Noble: I believe we need to look at the balance of power appropriately, and communicate any areas that is not being followed, according to city bylaws, rules, and make sure it changes. Any dispute should be resolved appropriately , while maintaining confidentiality in those issues. Sometimes it may be through policy direction, or mediation. Sometimes it will take advice to make sure it is correct.

Kaleb Orge: No response.

Cheryl Phaff: No response.

Steven Pudwell: The Municipal Government Act makes it clear that elected councillors are responsible for setting policy and direction, while CAO implements those decisions. That balance is important, but it only works when roles are respected and communication is strong. If disputes arise between council and CAO/administration, I believe they should be resolved through clear policy direction, respectful dialogue and mediation.

Michael Reid: No response.

Dan Reynish: No response.

Brian Edward Robinson: No response.

Kirby Schafer: No response.

Shila Sharps: No response.

Kirsten Spek: No response.

Micheal Starner: No response.

Clayton Stevens: No response.

Dave Toth: No response.

Alison Van Dyke: No response.

Brian Varga: No response.

Troy Wason: No response.

Stuart Young: No response.

Councillor

8 To Be Elected

Mark Douglas Albrecht: No response.

Kelly Allard: No response.

Laura Lee Butterfield: No response.

Stephen Campbell: No response.

Dana Eric Christensen: No response.

Ted Clugston: No response.

Bill Cocks: No response.

Gordon Edward Cowan: Yes i would support a ward system.

Robert Dumanowski: I believe the most important principle in any election system is that it allows residents to feel fairly represented and have their voices heard. A ward system can provide closer, more localized representation, but it can also create challenges, such as potentially pegging one area of the city’s needs against another, or leading councillors to focus primarily on their ward rather than the best interests of the whole community. The current at-large system encourages Council members to consider the city as a whole, which has its own advantages. For a major change like this, transparency and public input are essential. I would support holding a referendum (with the pros and cons clearly communicated) if there is sufficient community interest, so residents can decide directly whether a ward system is the right fit for Medicine Hat. Ultimately, any decision about our election system should strengthen representation, encourage engagement, and ensure that Council members continue to make decisions that serve the best interests of the entire community.

Christien (C.K.) Ellis: No response.

Jodi Faith: No response.

Don Fedoruk: No response.

Ron Fode: I would like to explore this or any kind of system that would increase accountability to citizens. So often requests are made with no response. This has to change.

Brock Hale: No response.

Chris Hellman: No response.

Jay Hitchen: No response.

Donald Brent Knudsen: No response.

Adam Daniel Koch: No response.

Pamela Kunz: No response.

Yusuf Ibrahim Mohammed: I’m open to considering a ward system, or at least a referendum. District-based representation can improve local accountability, especially in growing or diverse areas. But it must be carefully designed to avoid boundary manipulation or reduce city-wide cohesion. Before supporting such a change, I’d want thorough public consultation and a comparative study of other cities.

Kevin Monson: No response.

Immanuel Moritz: A ward system is a great idea. Divide the city into six areas with a councillor elected from each, and the Mayor elected at large. It gives residents a first point of contact who lives in their area. It is more democratic, everyone only gets one vote. Council will still provide governance for all citizens as a whole.

Randall Noble: I don’t know if I support system, in the way of voting. However, I would support a council representative, being responsible for certain areas of the city. So citizens know who to reach out to with their concerns, questions, and ideas. This would stop a lot of guessing on who to contact at City Hall. If enough citizens asked me about it, I would support having a referendum on it though.

Kaleb Orge: No response.

Cheryl Phaff: No response.

Steven Pudwell: Not for or against a ward system. I would have to do more research to find out is it more cost efficient and would it lead to more localized spending in areas compared to at large system.

Michael Reid: No response.

Dan Reynish: No response.

Brian Edward Robinson: No response.

Kirby Schafer: No response.

Shila Sharps: No response.

Kirsten Spek: No response.

Micheal Starner: No response.

Clayton Stevens: No response.

Dave Toth: No response.

Alison Van Dyke: No response.

Brian Varga: No response.

Troy Wason: No response.

Stuart Young: No response.

Councillor

8 To Be Elected

Mark Douglas Albrecht: No response.

Kelly Allard: No response.

Laura Lee Butterfield: No response.

Stephen Campbell: No response.

Dana Eric Christensen: No response.

Ted Clugston: No response.

Bill Cocks: No response.

Gordon Edward Cowan: I am a Conservative.

Robert Dumanowski: In a perfect world, I believe municipal government functions best when it is nonpartisan, because it is the level of government most closely connected to residents, and decisions should focus on the needs of the community rather than political agendas. Partisan politics at the municipal level can risk introducing favoritism—or the opposite—depending on whether the provincial or federal government is politically aligned with Council. It could also divide the public, creating unnecessary tensions between citizens based on political lines rather than shared community interests. Local issues—like utilities, infrastructure, recreation, and economic development—require practical solutions and collaboration across all perspectives. Being independent allows me to make decisions based solely on what is best for residents. My priority is to represent the interests of the entire community and work collaboratively to ensure Medicine Hat continues to be a strong, vibrant, and well-managed city.

Christien (C.K.) Ellis: No response.

Jodi Faith: No response.

Don Fedoruk: No response.

Ron Fode: I am not.

Brock Hale: No response.

Chris Hellman: No response.

Jay Hitchen: No response.

Donald Brent Knudsen: No response.

Adam Daniel Koch: No response.

Pamela Kunz: No response.

Yusuf Ibrahim Mohammed: I appreciate that municipal politics is distinct from provincial politics, and I prefer to keep it that way. My commitment is to working directly with local people to address our community’s specific needs—that’s why I’m running for municipal office. I’d rather keep any provincial or federal political party out of municipal politics. My focus is fully on my community and its values. I believe municipal government is most effective when its decisions are based on local priorities and solutions, rather than influenced by broader partisan agendas. This local-first approach ensures that our city’s unique challenges and opportunities are addressed in ways that reflect the voices and interests of those who live here.

Kevin Monson: No response.

Immanuel Moritz: I am a fiscal conservative. Government needs to spend within its means, not continually raise taxes and fees. My agenda is to keep spending as low as attainable to allow the citizens to keep as much of their hard earned money as possible

Randall Noble: I am not an affiliated with any provincial or federal political parties. I normally, seem to align more on the right end of the spectrum. However, I do look at all parties, and see which one aligns with my values, and will support my lifestyle, and help the economy grow.

Kaleb Orge: No response.

Cheryl Phaff: No response.

Steven Pudwell: Municipal government should be about people, not partisanship. I believe in hearing viewpoints from all sides, engaging in respectful dialogue, and making decisions that serve the whole of Medicine Hat.

Michael Reid: No response.

Dan Reynish: No response.

Brian Edward Robinson: No response.

Kirby Schafer: No response.

Shila Sharps: No response.

Kirsten Spek: No response.

Micheal Starner: No response.

Clayton Stevens: No response.

Dave Toth: No response.

Alison Van Dyke: No response.

Brian Varga: No response.

Troy Wason: No response.

Stuart Young: No response.